The question isn't: 'Should Labour replace Gordon Brown?' It's 'Why would anyone want to succeed...

Written by Stephen Tall on 25th July 2008 – 11:10 am Last night’s stunning SNP victory in Glasgow East caps one of the worst six months for the Labour party in at least 25 years. Policy gaffes and u-turns; a deeply unpopular leader; and catastrophic election defeats across the country – it doesn’t get much worse than this. The time has now passed when the question could genuinely be asked whether it is in Labour’s interest to replace Gordon Brown as leader. The answer is just too obvious: of course they should, and (if it can be achieved in a dignified way) the sooner the better. It isn’t just a matter of the polls, though they are dire. More importantly, Mr Brown has proven himself to be a failure as a leader, unable to communicate his vision, or how that vision could translate into policy, to either his party or the public.... [read full story]                    

Add Comment
There are also 603 related articles
View all news articles about*:
*Newstin tag cloud displays all featured persons, associated organisations, related topics, regions and companies